The CFO sees Agache. Sales sees LVMH. Who is the real customer? Read the Analysis
CRMDATA QUALITYSALES

Stop Trusting Company Names: The Guide to B2B Identity Resolution

Germain Bourgeois

Published on January 23, 2026

Run a Free Data Audit with DelphaSee us in action
Infographic explaining the Homonym Trap in Salesforce data management: two distinct companies with the same name mistakenly merged into a single record.

In the world of B2B data, the “Company Name” is a liar.

For decades, CRM managers have relied on company names to de-duplicate accounts. The logic seems sound: if a salesperson creates an account named “Bolt,” the system checks if “Bolt” already exists and merges them.

But in the modern global economy, this logic is causing data disasters. We have entered the era of the Homonym Trap. Companies are running out of unique names and choosing short, punchy nouns like Bolt, Bench, or Branch.

The result? Your CRM is likely merging unrelated businesses into “Frankenstein” accounts, confusing sales reps and breaking your territory reporting. The solution isn’t stricter name matching; it’s abandoning the name altogether in favor of the only reliable unique ID: the Website.

💡 Definition: The Homonym Trap
In B2B Data Management, the Homonym Trap occurs when a CRM erroneously merges two unrelated companies because they share a common name (e.g., “Bolt” or “Delta”), resulting in corrupted revenue data and broken territory assignments.

1. The “Frankenstein” Account Problem: Bolt vs. Bolt

The most famous example of the Homonym Trap involves two “Unicorn” companies that share the exact same name but operate in parallel universes.

  • The Fintech: Bolt (San Francisco). They focus on checkout experiences, and their digital home is bolt.com.
  • The Service App: Bolt (Estonia). They are a ride-hailing giant competing with Uber, located at bolt.eu.

The Data Risk:

If a US-based salesperson enters a lead for the “Bolt” checkout software, a name-based matching algorithm might merge it with the Estonian taxi company. Suddenly, your “Fintech” territory report includes revenue from European taxi rides.

The Website Matching Solution
Input: “Bolt”

Fintech

bolt.com

ID #1001
Ride-Hailing

bolt.eu

ID #2005

The Fix:

A website-based match sees that bolt.combolt.eu and correctly keeps them as two distinct unique records.

Comparison: Why Name Matching Fails vs. Website Matching

Comparison: Why Name Matching Fails vs. Website Matching
Feature Name Matching (Old Way) Website Matching (The Delpha Way)
Primary Key Company Name String Domain Name (URL)
Unicity Low (Duplicates common) High (Global standard)
Risk Merging unrelated companies (Homonyms) False positives from dummy data
Hierarchy Breaks easily (Orphans children) Preserves accurate family trees
Best For Mom & Pop shops (Local) Global B2B Enterprises

2. The “Extension” Crisis: Frame.io vs. Frame.com

Sometimes businesses are distinct, but the difference comes down to a tiny suffix. In the tech world, the .io extension is a badge of identity.

  • The SaaS: Frame.io (frame.io) is a cloud-based video collaboration platform.
  • The Retailer: Frame (frame.com) is a company that does custom photo printing and framing.

The Data Risk:

A matching system that strips extensions—treating frame.io and frame.com both as just “Frame”—will cause immediate data collisions. In these cases, the website is the identity.

3. The Impact on Hierarchies (The Hidden Cost)

The stakes get even higher when you try to build Account Hierarchies. If you use name matching to determine the Ultimate Parent, you risk attaching a child company to the wrong family tree entirely.

Let’s look at the Bolt example again. The European ride-hailing company (Bolt) owns a subsidiary called Viggo, a Danish ride-hailing startup.

  • The Name Match Failure: If you rely on names, you might accidentally attach Viggo to the US Fintech company simply because you matched it to the wrong “Bolt”.
  • The Website Success: If you rely on websites, the system analyzes the digital footprint. It sees that viggo.com shares DNS or email patterns with bolt.eu, not bolt.com, and correctly places it in the ride-hailing family tree.

(Need help fixing your parent-child relationships? See the 5 rules of parentage in our RevOps Account Hierarchy Cheat Sheet.)

4. The Golden Rule: Trust the Domain

Why is the website the best unique identifier in Salesforce? Unlike company names, a website domain is globally unique, strictly regulated, and prevents the “Homonym Trap” of merging unrelated businesses.

The Website is the “Goldilocks” identifier for Sales and Operations:

  1. Unique: No two companies can own bolt.com.
  2. Available: 99% of B2B companies have one.
  3. Strict: It prevents the “Branch” and “Frame” confusion instantly.

To ensure data integrity, stop matching strings of text. Start matching domains.

5. The Catch: Validating the Key

Moving to a website-first strategy has one prerequisite: Data Quality. If the website field is empty or contains dummy data (like tbc.com or google.com), you create false links.

This is where Delpha Ultimate Accounts makes the difference. Delpha doesn’t just use the website to match accounts; it ensures you have the right website in the first place.

The “Triangulation” Method:

Delpha runs a rigorous verification process by cross-referencing the Account Website against the Email Domains of the contacts attached to it.

DELPHA DETECT: Domain Mismatch! The account website should likely be branch.io

  • The Scenario: An account is named “Branch” with the website branch.com (Insurance), but all 5 contacts have emails ending in @branch.io (Tech).
  • The Fix: Delpha flags this discrepancy immediately and recommends changing the website to branch.io. This ensures the account is placed in the correct hierarchy before it causes downstream chaos.

Is your CRM full of "Frankenstein" accounts?
Don't just trust the domain—verify it. Identify your Homonym Traps and fix your hierarchies automatically.

Run a Free Data Audit with Delpha

Related Articles

Account Hierarchy Strategy: Solving the Finance vs. Sales Conflict

The Conflict: Legal Entity vs. Buying Group In the modern enterprise, the definition of a “customer” is fractured. It exists simultaneously as a legal construct designe...

Salesforce just spent $8B on Informatica – Here’s Why That’s Great News

Salesforce Acquires Informatica for $8 Billion On May 27, 2025, Salesforce announced a definitive agreement to acquire Informatica for approximately $8 billion in cash and stock. M...